[eng] Humanity has prioritized the selection of characters that allowed greater productivity
since the domestication of crops approximately 12,000 years ago. However,
considering the threat of climate change for agriculture, genetic improvement no
longer only considers the improvement of productive traits but also of those that
determine tolerance to stress. There is a generalized hypothesis that argues that
productivity and stress tolerance follow an inverse relationship, that is, as productivity
increases, stress tolerance decreases and vice versa. Considering the increase in the
world population, it is predicted that being able to feed all the people of the planet is
the greatest biotechnological and socioeconomic challenge of recent times. Since the
resources available for plants are finite, the carbon assimilated from the environment
through photosynthesis can be invested in plant growth, reproduction or defense in a
highly balanced manner to maximize plant fitness. Additionally, maximum
photosynthetical capacity (Amax) is driven by investments in leaf anatomy and the
photosynthetic metabolism, these investments can also compete with resources
needed for plant stress tolerance as well at anatomical level the antioxidant
metabolism. Both levels define stress tolerance, as well as the photosynthetic process
itself. In this way, in this TFM we proceeded with the characterization of 16 species of
plants from different environments of the world, with some from the most extreme
environments on the planet, such as the Arctic or Antarctica. A series of growth or
photosynthetic measurements were carried out under optimal conditions for each of
the species: photosynthetic measurements, freezing test, desiccation test, anatomical
characterization, and different biochemical parameters. We observed that polar
species usually tend to obtain higher stress tolerance values than "Mediterranean" and
"Model & Crops" species, but however their photosynthetical capacity was lower than
the others. Our results showed a new trade-off between Amax and dehydration
tolerance, which are related with anatomical parameters as Sc/S and Tchl. Interestingly,
we did not find a trade-off relationship with biochemical parameters as chlorophyll,
flavanols and anthocyanin contents. Altogether, these results open the opportunity to
establish the relationship between productivity and stress tolerance, which continues
to be a global biotechnological challenge today.