Relationship between Atherogenic Dyslipidaemia and Lipid Triad and Scales That Assess Insulin Resistance

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Paublini, Hernán
dc.contributor.author López González, Angel Arturo
dc.contributor.author Busquets-Cortés, Carla
dc.contributor.author Tomas-Gil, Pilar
dc.contributor.author Riutord-Sbert, Pere
dc.contributor.author Ramírez-Manent, José Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-02T10:32:19Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-02T10:32:19Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11201/161428
dc.description.abstract [eng] Background: Atherogenic dyslipidaemia (AD) and lipid triad (LT) are characterised by high triglyceride levels together with low HDL and normal or high LDL cholesterol and are favoured by a persistent state of insulin resistance (IR), which increases the release of free fatty acids from abdominal adipose tissue. This alteration in the lipid profile favours the accelerated development of atherosclerosis, which is the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in all countries in the developed and developing world. One of the elements that plays a major role in the genesis of AD is IR. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between variables that assess atherogenic risk (AD and LT) and scales that assess the risk of presenting insulin resistance. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study of 418,343 workers was conducted to evaluate atherogenic dyslipidaemia and lipid triad; a relationship with three insulin resistance risk scales (Triglycerides/HDL, TyG index, METS-IR) was established. The usefulness of IR risk scales for predicting AD and LT was calculated by applying ROC curves, obtaining the area under the curve (AUC) and cut-off points with their sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index. Multivariate analysis was performed by binary logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of high-risk values for insulin resistance with all of the scales is much higher in people with AD and LT compared to those without. The ROC curves present us with an AUC with the three insulin resistance risk scales for the two dyslipidaemias studied with figures ranging between 0.856 and 0.991, which implies that the results are good/very good. Conclusions: A relationship between atherogenic dyslipidaemia and the three insulin resistance risk scales assessed is revealed, with higher IR mean values and prevalence in people with atherogenic dyslipidaemia and lipid triad. The three scales make it possible to adequately classify the presence of AD and LT. The highest AUC is presented by the triglycerides/HDL scale, with a result close to 1. METS-IR is the most recommended formula to estimate insulin resistance.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.relation.isformatof Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092105
dc.relation.ispartof Nutrients, 2023, vol. 15 (9), num. 2105, p. 1-15
dc.rights cc-by (c) Paublini, Hernán et al., 2023
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.classification 61 - Medicina
dc.subject.other 61 - Medical sciences
dc.title Relationship between Atherogenic Dyslipidaemia and Lipid Triad and Scales That Assess Insulin Resistance
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated 2023-08-02T10:32:19Z
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092105


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by (c) Paublini, Hernán et al., 2023 Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by (c) Paublini, Hernán et al., 2023

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics