Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Treatment vs Hospitalization for Infective Endocarditis: Validation of the OPAT-GAMES Criteria

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pericàs, Juan M.
dc.contributor.author Llopis, Jaume
dc.contributor.author Muñoz, Patricia
dc.contributor.author González-Ramallo, Víctor
dc.contributor.author García-Leoni, M. Eugenia
dc.contributor.author de Alarcón, Arístides
dc.contributor.author Luque, Rafael
dc.contributor.author Fariñas, M. Carmen
dc.contributor.author Goenaga, Miguel Á.
dc.contributor.author Hernández-Meneses, Marta
dc.contributor.author Nicolás, David
dc.contributor.author Ramos-Martínez, Antonio
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez-Esteban, M. Ángeles
dc.contributor.author Villoslada-Gelabert, Aroa
dc.contributor.author Miró, José M.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-12T08:48:49Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-12T08:48:49Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11201/164680
dc.description.abstract Background. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) programs are increasingly used to manage infective endocarditis (IE), but current criteria for indicating OPAT are markedly conservative. We aimed to investigate whether more liberal criteria for indicating OPAT in IE can be safely used. Methods. This was a prospective multicenter nationwide cohort study (2008-2018). Rates of readmission, recurrences, and 1-year mortality were compared between hospital-based antibiotic treatment (HBAT) and OPAT. Risk factors for readmission and mortality in OPAT patients were investigated by logistic regression. Patients did not fulfill OPAT-GAMES (Grupos de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis en ESpaña) criteria if they had any of the following: cirrhosis, severe central nervous system emboli, undrained abscesses, severe conditions requiring cardiac surgery in nonoperable patients, severe postsurgical complications, highly difficult-to-treat microorganisms, or intravenous drug use. Results. A total of 2279 HBAT patients and 1268 OPAT patients were included. Among OPAT patients, 307 (24.2%) did not fulfill OPAT-GAMES criteria. Overall, OPAT patients presented higher rates of readmission than HBAT patients (18.2% vs 14.4%; P =.004), but no significant differences were found in the propensity analysis. Patients not fulfilling OPAT-GAMES criteria presented significantly higher rates of readmission than HBAT and OPAT-GAMES (23.8%, 14.4%, 16.4%; P<.001), whereas no significant differences were found in mortality (5.9%, 8%, 7.4%; P=.103) or recurrences (3.9%, 3.1%, 2.5%; P=.546). Not fulfilling OPAT-GAMES criteria was associated with higher risk of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-1.97; P=.03), whereas cardiac surgery was associated with lower risk (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98; P=.03). Conclusions. OPAT-GAMES criteria allow identification of IE patients at higher risk of long-term complications to whom OPAT cannot be safely administered. Keywords. infective endocarditis; mortality; outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment; readmission; recurrences
dc.format application/pdf
dc.relation.isformatof
dc.relation.ispartof Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022
dc.rights , 2022
dc.subject.classification 61 - Medicina
dc.subject.other 61 - Medical sciences
dc.title Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Treatment vs Hospitalization for Infective Endocarditis: Validation of the OPAT-GAMES Criteria
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated 2024-02-12T08:48:49Z
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics