dc.contributor.author |
Luján, José Luis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Todt, Oliver |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-09-25T06:30:39Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-09-25T06:30:39Z |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11201/166185 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
[eng] The aim of obtaining the most accurate and complete scientific information as input for regulatory decision making is not always the most suitable one, due to the consequences on the population level of alternative regulatory options. |
|
dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
dc.relation.isformatof |
Versió postprint del document publicat a: |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
2018, vol. 19, p. 194-196 |
|
dc.rights |
(c) Luján, José Luis et al., 2018 |
|
dc.subject.classification |
Ciència |
|
dc.subject.classification |
34 - Dret |
|
dc.subject.other |
Science |
|
dc.subject.other |
34 - Law. Jurisprudence |
|
dc.title |
The dilemmas of science for policy: Scientific evidence and the consequences of regulatory options in risk and benefit assessment |
|
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
|
dc.date.updated |
2024-09-25T06:30:41Z |
|
dc.rights.accessRights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|