A brief measure for the assessment of competence in coping with death: The Coping with Death Scale short version

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Laura Galiana
dc.contributor.author Amparo Oliver
dc.contributor.author Gustavo de Simone
dc.contributor.author Juan P. Linzitto
dc.contributor.author Enric Benito & Noemí Sansó
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-29T11:50:58Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-29T11:50:58Z
dc.identifier.citation Galiana, L., Oliver, A., De Simone, G., Linzitto, J. P., Benito, E., i Sansó, N. (2019). A brief measure for the assessment of competence in coping with death: The coping with death scale short version. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 57(2), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.003 ca
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11201/168146
dc.description.abstract [eng] Context. The coping with death competence is of great importance for palliative care professionals, who face daily exposure to death. It can keep them from suffering compassion fatigue and burnout, thus enhancing the quality of the care provided. Despite its relevance, there are only two measures of professionals' ability to cope with death. Specifically, the Coping with Death Scale (CDS) has repeatedly shown psychometric problems with some of its items. Objective. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short version of the CDS. Methods. Nine items from the original CDS were chosen for the short version. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Spanish (N=385) and Argentinian (N=273) palliative care professionals. The CDS and the Professional Quality of Life Scale were used in this study. Statistical analyses included two Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA), followed by a standard measurement invariance routine. Reliability estimates and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also gathered. Results. CFA models had excellent fit in both the Spanish (χ 2(27)=107.043, p<.001; CFI=.978; TLI=.970; RMSEA=.093 [.075,.112]; SRMR=.030) and Argentinian (χ 2(27)=102.982, p<.001; CFI=.963; TLI=.950; RMSEA=.106[.085,.128]) samples. A standard measurement invariance routine was carried out. The most parsimonious model (χ 2(117)=191.738, p<.001; CFI=.987; TLI=.992; RMSEA=.046[.034,.058]; SRMR=.043) offered evidence of invariance across countries, with no latent mean differences. Evidence of reliability and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also appropriate. Conclusion. Results indicated the psychometric boundaries of the short version of the CDS. en
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format.extent 209-215
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2019, vol. 57, num. 2, p. 209-215
dc.rights all rights reserved
dc.subject.classification 159.9 - Psicologia
dc.subject.other 159.9 - Psychology
dc.title A brief measure for the assessment of competence in coping with death: The Coping with Death Scale short version en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type Article
dc.date.updated 2025-01-29T11:50:58Z
dc.subject.keywords Validity
dc.subject.keywords palliative care
dc.subject.keywords Coping
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.003


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics