Distraction from pain: The role of selective attention and pain catastrophizing

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rischer, K.M.
dc.contributor.author González-Roldán, A.M.
dc.contributor.author Montoya, P.
dc.contributor.author Gigl, S.
dc.contributor.author Anton, F.
dc.contributor.author van der Meulen, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-16T08:28:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-16T08:28:01Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11201/156156
dc.description.abstract [eng] Background Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive engagement in reducing concurrent pain. However, little is known about the role of individual differences in inhibitory control abilities and negative pain-related cognitions in modulating the magnitude of this type of distraction from pain. Methods In a pain distraction paradigm, 41 participants completed a working memory task with both a demanding high load condition (2-back) and an easy low load condition (0-back), while receiving warm or painful thermal stimuli to their left forearm. To control for individual differences in sensitivity to pain and perceived task difficulty, nociceptive stimulus intensity and task speed were individually calibrated. Additionally, participants completed a set of cognitive inhibition tasks (flanker, go/nogo, Stroop) and questionnaires about negative pain-related cognitions (fear of pain, pain catastrophizing) prior to the distraction paradigm. Results As expected, engaging in the high load condition significantly reduced perceived intensity and unpleasantness of nociceptive stimuli, compared to the low load condition. The size of the distraction effect correlated significantly with better cognitive inhibition and selective attention abilities, as measured by the flanker task. A moderation analysis revealed a significant interaction between pain catastrophizing and performance in the flanker task in predicting the distraction effect size: Participants who performed well on the flanker task showed more pain reduction, but only when they were average to high pain catastrophizers. Conclusions Selective attention abilities and pain catastrophizing seem to be important factors in explaining individual differences in the size of the analgesic response to a distractive task. Significance Understanding which factors influence the effectiveness of cognitive engagement in distracting from pain could help to optimize its therapeutic application in patient care. This study shows that a complex interplay of cognitive inhibition abilities, specifically selective attention, and negative pain-related cognitions, such as pain catastrophizing, modulate the magnitude of the distraction effect.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.relation.isformatof Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1634
dc.relation.ispartof European Journal Of Pain, 2020, vol. 24, num. 10, p. 1880-1891
dc.rights (c) European Federation of the International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters (EFIC), 2020
dc.subject.classification 159.9 - Psicologia
dc.subject.other 159.9 - Psychology
dc.title Distraction from pain: The role of selective attention and pain catastrophizing
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.date.updated 2021-11-16T08:28:01Z
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1634


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics