Enhancing Surgical Wound Monitoring: A Paired Cohort Study Evaluating a New AI-Based Application for Automatic Detection of Potential Infections

Abstract

[eng] Background/Objectives: This study assessed the feasibility and security of remote surgical wound monitoring using the RedScar© smartphone app, which employs automated diagnosis for early visual detection of infections without direct healthcare personnel involvement. Additionally, patient satisfaction with telematic care was evaluated as a secondary aim. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), leading to prolonged hospital stays, heightened patient distress, and increased healthcare costs. Methods: The study employed a prospective paired-cohort and single-blinded design, with a sample size of 47 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. RedScar© was used for remote telematic monitoring, evaluating the feasibility and security of this approach. A satisfaction questionnaire assessed patient experience. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05485233. Results: Out of 47 patients, 41 successfully completed both remote and in-person follow-ups. RedScar© demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% in detecting SSIs, with a specificity of 83.13%. The kappa coefficient of 0.8171 indicated substantial agreement between the application’s results and human observers. Patient satisfaction with telemonitoring was high: 97.6% believed telemonitoring reduces costs, 90.47% perceived it prevents work/school absenteeism, and 80.9% found telemonitoring comfortable. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate an automatic smartphone application on real patients for diagnosing postoperative wound infections. It establishes the safety and feasibility of telematic follow-up using the RedScar© application for surgical wound assessment. The high sensitivity suggests its utility in identifying true cases of infection, highlighting its potential role in clinical practice. Future studies are needed to address limitations and validate the efficacy of RedScar© in diverse patient populations.